The year was 1971, and the Nixon administration was ramping up its efforts to crack down on drug use in the United States. But as the escalation unfolded, it became increasingly clear that the prohibition of drugs was not just about protecting public health, but rather a calculated political move.

In a bold move, the administration declared cannabis as “public enemy number one.” But behind closed doors, Nixon himself was not convinced of the drug’s danger. In fact, he was quoted as saying that he didn’t find it “particularly dangerous” and thought the penalties for possession were “ridiculous.”

This contradiction revealed the fundamentally dishonest nature of prohibition. It was not about protecting the people, but rather a means to control and manipulate certain communities. And this was made even more apparent by the later admission of Nixon’s advisor, John Ehrlichman, who stated that the administration couldn’t make it illegal to be against the Vietnam War or Black, but they could criminalize drugs associated with these groups.

This admission exposed prohibition as a deliberate political warfare against dissenting communities. It was a way to target and oppress those who spoke out against the government and its actions. And this revelation only added to the growing skepticism and criticism of the war on drugs.

As the years went on, the flaws and failures of prohibition became more and more apparent. The criminalization of drugs did not solve the issue of drug use, but rather perpetuated a cycle of violence and incarceration. And the targeting of certain communities only further perpetuated systemic racism and oppression.

The 1971 escalation under Nixon was a turning point in the war on drugs. It revealed the true intentions behind prohibition and sparked a movement to challenge and dismantle it. And while the fight against the war on drugs continues to this day, the dishonesty and political motivations behind it will always be remembered.  

Author